13 replies to this topic

[Yorkie King]

http://www.dailymail...er-migrant.html


They will be putting whites in zoo's one day under the label "Endangered species" http://www.uepenglan...tyle_emoticons/default/angry.gif

[Andy]

Revealed: The British towns where one worker in two is a migrant

A map today reveals parts of Britain where more than half of jobs are held by workers who were born overseas.
The workforce in large parts of London is dominated by people born abroad – despite Labour’s repeated promises to deliver ‘British jobs for British workers’.
But foreign-born employees also have a strong foothold in other British towns and cities, from Slough and Reading to Manchester.
Campaigners said the focus of employers and Whitehall should be on finding jobs for the young Britons out of work in many of these areas.




And last night, immigration minister Damian Green said: ‘This shows why we need a limit on work visas as well as a better trained British workforce.
'British workers need to be able to benefit and take the jobs available.’

The most startling figures, based on information from the Office for National Statistics, relate to Newham – the East London borough hosting the 2012 Olympics.

Here, almost seven in every ten jobs are filled by workers who were not born in the UK – or 65,100 out of 93,700 posts. Many of the jobs are on the Olympic site itself.
The number of British-born people in Newham who are not in work is 25,600. This is a combination of the unemployed and those classed as ‘economically inactive’, such as students and the long-term sick.

There are six local authority areas where more than 50 per cent of the jobs are filled by migrant workers – and a further 18 where those born outside the UK take up more than one in every three jobs.

Outside London, the areas where the biggest proportion of jobs are taken by immigrants are Slough, Leicester, Luton, Reading, Cambridge, Manchester and Oxford.

Crawley, in West Sussex, and Elmbridge, in Surrey, are also at the top of the list.
Many overseas workers in places such as Slough and Reading are Eastern Europeans who do not need work permits.
Experts say this makes it more important for the Government to impose a strict cap on non-EU migrants in an attempt to bring the total number of foreign workers under control.

The coalition unveiled an interim cap this week, along with a plan to make employers provide non-EU migrants with private healthcare to ease pressure on the NHS.
The final level of the cap will be decided later this year.

Alp Mehmet, of MigrationWatch, said: ‘Where there are gaps in the UK labour market we should be filling them from the UK population.
‘There is a laxness and a looseness about the way people are allowed in. What we want is closer control.’

The area with the smallest proportion of foreign-born workers is Newark and Sherwood, in Nottinghamshire, at 1.5 per cent.

Under Labour more than 1.1million jobs – half the total created – were taken by non-EU immigrants requiring work permits, according to the independent House of Commons Library.

In October 1997, British-born workers made up 92.5 per cent of the workforce. By 2009, this had fallen to 87.1 per cent.

[Andy]

George Osborne was forced on the back foot last night over claims that his Budget will cost 1.3 million jobs over the next five years.

Leaked Treasury estimates reveal that the coalition Government’s spending cuts could see between 500,000 and 600,000 posts lost in the state sector.

The unpublished papers also predict that the cuts will lead to the loss of another 700,000 positions in the private sector by 2015 as the cutbacks bite, robbing private firms of Government contracts and the knock on effects of higher spending.

The good news for the Chancellor is that the Treasury estimate that by tackling Britain’s record budget deficit, the Government will reassure the financial markets, keep interests rates low and enable the private sector to create 2.5 million jobs over the next five years.
So how does that work? If more people are out of work where do they get the money to buy from the new private industries?
The ONLY hope we have of emerging from recession is to massively reduce our population therefore the private industry revenue doesnt get spread so thinly to support our over populated country.
I think that the 2.5 million jobs they are talking about is the privatisation of the councils. Privatising dustbin removals etc.

That will more than outweigh the loss of jobs caused by the spending cuts – allowing the number of people in work to rise from 28.8 million this year to 20.1 million in 2015.
But if more than a million posts are lost in the meantime, it is likely to fuel public discontent and union militancy against the Government.
Ive been saying this for a while now.

The major danger for the coalition is that the job losses will be most severe in areas of the country, in the North, which are most reliant on the state for jobs and investment – and that private sector firms in those areas will be hard hit as well.
One slide from an internal Budget presentation leaked to the left-wing Guardian newspaper reads: ‘100-120,000 public sector jobs and 120-140,000 private sector jobs assumed to be lost per annum for five years through cuts’.


The estimates suggest at least 2,000 jobs a week are to go from the public sector and up to 2,800 a week from the private sector as a direct result of what the Government admits is the toughest tightening since the Second World War.
The Chancellor has stressed that the Government will reduce the number of public sector workers as far as possible by not filling vacant posts, rather than laying off workers.

But the internal documents may explain Mr Osborne’s reluctance last week to detail the likely effects of his Budget on employment.

The leaking of such an explosive document will be of great concern to the Chancellor since it suggests Labour sympathisers in the civil service want to sabotage the coalition’s economic policies and drive a wedge between Tories and Liberal Democrats.
Senior Labour figures are already trying to persuade Lib Dem left-wingers – uneasy at the rise in VAT and Tory plans to slash benefits – to rebel against their leader Nick Clegg or switch parties.

Shadow Chancellor Alistair Darling leapt on the findings in the Treasury documents.
He said: ‘Far from being open and honest, as George Osborne put it, he failed to tell the country there would be very substantial job losses as a result of his budget.
‘The Tories did not have to take these measures. They chose to take them. They are not only a real risk to the recovery but hundreds of thousands of people will pay the price for the poor judgement of the Conservatives, fully supported by the Liberal Democrats.’
With union bosses already predicting nationwide strikes, The TUC general secretary, Brendan Barber, warned of ‘dole queues comparable to the 1980s, a new deep north-south divide and widespread poverty’.
He said: ‘With Treasury figures revealing that spending cuts will hit private sector jobs harder than those in the public sector, it is absurd to think that the private sector will create 2.5m new jobs over the next five years.’
While Labours answer was to borrow borrow borrow, that would have worked....not.

Sources close to Mr Osborne last night stressed that the leaked document only presented one side of the argument, by emphasising the jobs that would be lost and not the greater number that will be created.
Treasury officials pointed to estimates by the new independent Office of Budget Responsibility, which now draws up estimates for use by the Chancellor, which predict that unemployment will start to come down.
How???
A spokesman said: ‘The OBR forecast unemployment to fall in every year and employment to rise.’
A Treasury source added: ‘The OBR is independent and has access to everything. Jobs are lost and created all the time. What matters is the total numbers.
‘Before the election all three major parties agreed that fewer people will be employed by the state. Alistair Darling is on record saying that there will be a reduction in public sector headcount.’
The Treasury figures are consistent with some already issued by industry groups. The Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development has estimated that there will be 725,000 jobs lost in the public sector alone by 2015.
But the group’s chief economist John Philpott last night questioned Mr Osborne’s hopes of achieving 2.5 million extra jobs in the private sector.
He said: ‘There is not a hope in hell's chance of this happening.
‘There would have to be extraordinarily strong private sector employment growth in a much less conducive economic environment than it was during the boom.’

[Andy]

The two articles are very relevant.

Our country is going to see MASSIVE job losses.

Foreigners are doing most of the jobs.

If benefits are available to support the unemployed then the British people will sit back and watch Jeremy Kyle and all the other shyte on TV.
If benefits are not going to keep people in their homes etc then watch for the civil unrest and race war.

[Phil]

This paints a frightening picture for the future, but should not just be taken on face value these figures are designed to disturb but not frightened enough as to provoke too much of a reaction from the indigenous population.

The figures shown are for Non Uk born workers, if you add into the equation workers that are UK born but are of non indigenous peoples then these figures would go throught the roof.

We are always being told that, in Leicester, we will become a minority in the next 3-5 years but that really is a bag of old bollocks. the evidence of my own eyes shows that it is already the case.

This is once again an exercise in controlled information being fed to the peoples.

Lib/Con same shit different wrapper

[Andy]

 Phil, on 30 June 2010 - 04:33 PM, said:

This paints a frightening picture for the future, but should not just be taken on face value these figures are designed to disturb but not frightened enough as to provoke too much of a reaction from the indigenous population.

The figures shown are for Non Uk born workers, if you add into the equation workers that are UK born but are of non indigenous peoples then these figures would go throught the roof.

We are always being told that, in Leicester, we will become a minority in the next 3-5 years but that really is a bag of old bollocks. the evidence of my own eyes shows that it is already the case.

This is once again an exercise in controlled information being fed to the peoples.

Lib/Con same shit different wrapper

I agree with you Phil, British born non indiginous peoples are never counted.

I wonder how many will sod off in the coming few years as English benefits drop to third country level.

It really pisses me off that I have worked all my life, for a large part of it doing two jobs. Yet I could soon loose my main income and end up needing benefits which wont be there.

[Yorkie King]

I propose Andy for immigration Minister, any seconds?

[Andy]

 Yorkie King, on 02 July 2010 - 06:10 PM, said:

I propose Andy for immigration Minister, any seconds?

I wouldnt have a job for long then! My first act would be to close our borders to all immigration, work permits, scholorships etc etc

[Andy]

Daily Express


BRITAIN’S welfare bill has soared from £69billion to £152billion over the last 30 years, according to the ONS report.


The increase represents a 122 per cent rise since 1978/79.

And in a sign of taxpayers’ frustration with the ever-higher bill, the report reveals that 53 per cent of Britons now feel too much is paid to the unemployed and other benefit claimants – up a third in 10 years.

Matthew Sinclair, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “The huge social security bill has become an unsustainable burden on ordinary families. Reform is needed to get more people into work.”

Expenditure on social security benefit payments – including unemployment, disability allowances and state pensions – rose each year from 1978/79, apart from falls between 1987/88 and 1989/90 and between 1996/97 and 1997/98.







So a growing population of unemployed whilst our private sector workforce is in decline.

How many people can our money producing industries support?
How many public sector jobs?
How many welfare claiments?
How many layers of MPs
How much can we keep giving to the EU and in foreighn aid?

[edmundy]

And how accurate are the official statistics? Tip of the iceberg I reckon..The real numbers would be terrifying.

[Andy]

 edmundy, on 03 July 2010 - 08:43 AM, said:

And how accurate are the official statistics? Tip of the iceberg I reckon..The real numbers would be terrifying.

The real numbers will never be released, only guesses at what they could be, and those guesses will be low.

MIGRATIONWATCH UK are the only organization I would consider believing.

[Witnere]

Cosy lifestyles are about to go pop, no jobs, those jobs that exist are low paid and going to foriegners, treated as second-raters in our own homeland. Here it comes people, and I'll say at long last!

[Steven]

Just think, six or seven years from now a whole new generation of kids - those born to migrants - will start hitting the jobs market. Native whites can now be legally discriminated against for jobs. What a mess.

Steve

[southerner]

 Steven, on 15 April 2011 - 04:17 PM, said:

Just think, six or seven years from now a whole new generation of kids - those born to migrants - will start hitting the jobs market. Native whites can now be legally discriminated against for jobs. What a mess.

Steve

Whites discriminated against when they are the majority and also when or if they become a minority.